本文发表在 rolia.net 枫下论坛First of all, this silver salt-cellar isn't priceless at all. Yes, It may be worth something but it is still a piece of tableware, which was among many of its own kind on dinning tables at that event.
Second, about this fellow guest who actually steal the salt cellar. He luckily had a name and his name is Farkouk I, King of Egypt and Sudan, Sovereign of Nubia, of Kordofan, and of Darfur during that time.
This king had many strange habits and stealing from others is the most odd one of his. Anyway, you can Google his name and find out more details about him.
Third, the king was infamous by his action by then so that everyone was in that event knew about what he intends to do. There was no such thing that he attempted to make for the door quietly and Mr. Churchill was not dare to stop him by so called pretending to be the king's "partner in crime" either.
What was really happened was that Mr. Churchill did try to relieve the tension by grabbing the remaining tableware to his pocket and somehow managed to look like a bad joke.
In return, the king gave up his souvenir but to steal Mr. Churchill's pocket watch instead. I believe both of them knew about it whatssoever. :))) After all, this was just a game between two powerful fellows to enjoy each other.
What have we learned from this kind of stories?
If something seems odd, unusual, too little or too much, there must be several unexplained reasons behind it. Learning from reading the blank of the books is an essential skill, which can be used to solve unanswered historical questions. Personally I use it a lot , therefore, I know it from my previous experiences that common sense does work so please use it freely.更多精彩文章及讨论,请光临枫下论坛 rolia.net
Second, about this fellow guest who actually steal the salt cellar. He luckily had a name and his name is Farkouk I, King of Egypt and Sudan, Sovereign of Nubia, of Kordofan, and of Darfur during that time.
This king had many strange habits and stealing from others is the most odd one of his. Anyway, you can Google his name and find out more details about him.
Third, the king was infamous by his action by then so that everyone was in that event knew about what he intends to do. There was no such thing that he attempted to make for the door quietly and Mr. Churchill was not dare to stop him by so called pretending to be the king's "partner in crime" either.
What was really happened was that Mr. Churchill did try to relieve the tension by grabbing the remaining tableware to his pocket and somehow managed to look like a bad joke.
In return, the king gave up his souvenir but to steal Mr. Churchill's pocket watch instead. I believe both of them knew about it whatssoever. :))) After all, this was just a game between two powerful fellows to enjoy each other.
What have we learned from this kind of stories?
If something seems odd, unusual, too little or too much, there must be several unexplained reasons behind it. Learning from reading the blank of the books is an essential skill, which can be used to solve unanswered historical questions. Personally I use it a lot , therefore, I know it from my previous experiences that common sense does work so please use it freely.更多精彩文章及讨论,请光临枫下论坛 rolia.net