This topic has been archived. It cannot be replied.
-
工作学习 / 外语学习 / Is there any grammar problem in the sentence.
-rsam007(rsam007);
2011-11-20
{735}
(#7085344@0)
-
觉的able 后面那个逗号是错的。not willing, or able to go it alone 看着舒服点。
-c1xwy(洪兴罩俺去战斗);
2011-11-20
(#7085387@0)
-
假设这句话没有语法问题， willing ... 是什末语法现象？
-rsam007(rsam007);
2011-11-20
(#7085547@0)
-
现代分词作定语。
-geekcode(吉客唐德);
2011-11-20
(#7085581@0)
-
willing就是个形容词。形容词后置。跟分词没什么关系。
-englearner(majia);
2011-11-21
(#7086122@0)
-
两个逗号要么都要，要么都不要，语法上都对，但含义略有不同。
-rockywei(落基山);
2011-11-20
(#7085606@0)
-
As you analyzed, it looks correct to me.
-geekcode(吉客唐德);
2011-11-20
(#7085544@0)
-
"singles not willing, or able, to go it alone..." 实际就是 “singles THAT(或者
WHO) ARE not willing, or able, to go it alone..."
-rockywei(落基山);
2011-11-20
(#7085599@0)
-
singles 的定语从句。不记得定语从句可以省略从句中的主语和谓语
-rsam007(rsam007);
2011-11-20
(#7085622@0)
-
定语从句本来就是代替形容词或者分词的。最简单的如常说的There is something wrong. = There is something that is wrong.
-rockywei(落基山);
2011-11-20
(#7085633@0)
-
thanks. but your example: there is something wrong. this "wrong " plays complement function. anything i am going send email the writer.
-rsam007(rsam007);
2011-11-20
(#7085643@0)
-
correction: anything -> anyway
-rsam007(rsam007);
2011-11-20
(#7085646@0)
-
好吧，再举一个近一点例子：The person posting on rolia is rsam007. = The person WHO IS posting on rolia is rsam007. 类似这样的句子比比皆是。
-rockywei(落基山);
2011-11-20
(#7085654@0)
-
yes. Agree with you for this example. posting = participial adjective.
-rsam007(rsam007);
2011-11-20
(#7085700@0)
-
如果信还没发出去，就别发了吧.
-winterstorm(打酱油的);
2011-11-21
(#7085868@0)
-
原文是对的，只需要两个逗号，相当于下面的左右括号：singles not willing (or able) to go it alone are teaming up....
-hsl(胡司令);
2011-11-20
(#7085664@0)
-
原句没有语法问题。相当于形容词后置。类似于“somthing wrong, something new, something important etc....”. "willing" 和 able 都是形容词，前者表示”愿意的“，后者是“有能力的“。理论上讲， willing singles, able singles, 也都是正确的表达， 只不过不常用而已。再加上这句话后面还有to go it alone, 所以will 和able 后置就更顺理成章了。
-winterstorm(打酱油的);
2011-11-21
{151}
(#7085866@0)
-
many thanks. It's good to review English grammars. This sentence uses adjective phrase to modify the none, so the phrase has to be after the modified none.
-rsam007(rsam007);
2011-11-26
(#7100863@0)
-
correction: none -> noun
-rsam007(rsam007);
2011-11-26
(#7100868@0)