This topic has been archived. It cannot be replied.
-
工作学习 / English / 请教一个语法问题(Long before) instruments were solely associated (with) creating music, (they) played an essential role in many ceremonies, (including) both religious and pagan.
A. Long before
B. with
C. they
D.including
Which one is wrong and why?
-szmob(szmob);
2002-7-10
{243}
(#629447@0)
-
a
-lilyba(Sunshine);
2002-7-10
(#629454@0)
-
A,原因：感觉不好。HOHO，跟没说一样。
-ltjt86(tyson~~从东飞到西~~);
2002-7-10
(#629456@0)
-
not correct
-szmob(szmob);
2002-7-10
(#629458@0)
-
before) instruments were solely associated (with) creating music, (they) played an essential role in many ceremonies, (including) both religious and pagan. 这样一读，咋读咋通顺。
-lilyba(Sunshine);
2002-7-10
(#629459@0)
-
hand hand.
-ltjt86(tyson~~从东飞到西~~);
2002-7-10
(#629469@0)
-
a. 其他的三个好象没问题, 只有A怪怪的.
-olivetree(Olive Tree);
2002-7-10
(#629460@0)
-
The answer is D. I do not know why? Any one can explain?
-szmob(szmob);
2002-7-10
(#629465@0)
-
答案也会有出错的时候的。:P听听你看的这本书的可信性有多高吧，要是新东方的什么东西，那可信性就差点儿。
-ltjt86(tyson~~从东飞到西~~);
2002-7-10
(#629476@0)
-
D
-dundas888(敦达寺);
2002-7-10
(#629464@0)
-
correct. but why?
-szmob(szmob);
2002-7-10
(#629468@0)
-
D. 因为有逗号所以不能用分词
-zhihaoxx(辛普);
2002-7-10
(#629473@0)
-
", which included", 或 "including" (without , )
-zhihaoxx(辛普);
2002-7-10
(#629478@0)
-
I got it , thanks a lot.
-szmob(szmob);
2002-7-10
(#629481@0)
-
u r welcome
-zhihaoxx(辛普);
2002-7-10
(#629501@0)
-
相信你那分数的真实性了！红外范围不会超过一尺，能满足你的要求吗？
-zhoulang(笑看风云);
2002-7-10
{40}
(#629488@0)
-
好好好! 你现在有?
-zhihaoxx(辛普);
2002-7-10
(#629500@0)
-
:-( 没有。你倒是可以用我的笔记本试试，红外连接距离太短了，速度也狂慢。
-zhoulang(笑看风云);
2002-7-10
(#629508@0)
-
如果是d, 是否由于religious and pagan. 非名词吧。(不敢确定）
-lilyba(Sunshine);
2002-7-10
(#629480@0)
-
这两个词也可做名词，但都是代表“人”，所以不管怎样用现代分词肯定是错的。
-rockywei(落基山);
2002-7-10
(#629511@0)
-
A，如果题目没抄错的话。
long before, 可以作形容词，副词，名词，却不能做连词，但此处却需要一个连词。否则整句成为典型的 run on 句子 。应改为可用作连词的Before。
-badmintonfan(业余中手);
2002-7-10
{670}
(#630166@0)
-
感觉你的说法更可信一些.总觉得这个long before怪怪的.
-ltjt86(tyson~~从东飞到西~~);
2002-7-10
(#630199@0)
-
DONT THINK SO, if 'before' is conjunctive, there is nothing wrong to use an adverb "long" before 'before', AND your example is ok but misleading, you talk about bin lie ju (using semicolon to separate...) , here 'before...' is a clause already,my best analysis is that the error is at "they", simply a 'guo qu wan cheng shi' should be used---they had...
-youfake(油法开---上海口音);
2002-7-10
{113}
(#630536@0)
-
Yes, I think you are right. The 'long before' here might not be used as a whole phase, but as noun "long " + conj " before ", so the first half sentence has already been a clause.
-badmintonfan(业余中手);
2002-7-11
(#631065@0)
-
不知道为什么你会有这样的结论，你在google上查查，会得到一大堆以long before开头的句子。如果说个人网站有可能错的话，大名鼎鼎的“今日美国”(USA Today)应该不会犯这种低级错误吧？
-zhihaoxx(辛普);
2002-7-10
(#630674@0)
-
我也搜索了一下，确实发现不少，应该你是对的。
-badmintonfan(业余中手);
2002-7-11
(#631043@0)
-
这个句子错在THEY。因为LONG BEFORE引导的是一个从句，一般用代词（THEY）作主语（也有用名词的），但主句的主语则一般不用代词，而用名词（句中用THEY做主语而不是INSTRUMENTS，所以错）。
-pocket(老军医);
2002-7-10
(#630238@0)
-
C is wrong. It should be " they had". good luck!
-hipenguin(又一个四年);
2002-7-11
(#631073@0)
-
Agreed! 过去的过去用过去完成时。两例句：1）Disease Starts Long Before You Have Symptoms. 2）Moore's law loses its credibility long before we reach absolute physical limits.
-flyingdust(FlyingDust);
2002-7-11
(#632694@0)
-
D, should be "such as".
-subway2001(三明治);
2002-7-11
(#631911@0)
-
看了很多的回答，感觉是把问题搞的更复杂了。只想在这里明确一下，正确答案应该是D。也就是说将including去掉，该句子才成立。including的用法是前面列举了一些事情之后，不想一一列举完，便用inluding将自己认为应该包括在内的东西说出来。该句子并没有列举ceremony A或ceremony B 然后再inluding “ceremony C”来表示还有更多的ceremony D or more. 此处的both religious and pagan只是形容词短语做补语来说明ceremony性质，所以including就多余了。long before一点也不怪(它引导时间状语从句)，they更是不能丢(因为它是主句的主语，代instruments)，with当然改不得(associate with是动词短语，犹如connect with一样)
-chinasmilemoonlight(Canada Goose);
2002-7-22
{458}
(#651124@0)
-
一点意见：including both religious and pagan应该是修饰they吧，而非ceremonies。从句（long before引导的）是时间状语，说的是过去的事，那主句应该是过去完成式吧。应该选C。 A，D应该没错
-rabbitbug(兔八哥);
2002-7-23
(#651248@0)
-
千万别说C是错的！
-chinasmilemoonlight(Canada Goose);
2002-7-23
{2546}
(#652434@0)
-
D是错的，但上面各位理由不当。其实很简当：include为及物动词，后面跟名词性宾语。所以， 应为“,including both religious and pagan ones." 或 ”，both religios and pagan" 作为后置定语。
-a-oh(阿噢);
2002-7-23
{141}
(#652459@0)