This topic has been archived. It cannot be replied.
-
工作学习 / 外语学习 / 听力的基础是“口语”--再谈motor theory以及语言学习的顺序规律
-davidsz08(我来劲了);
2014-8-19
{1760}
(#8939229@0)
-
这么多的理论啊！即使是奥运游泳冠军对运动科学（流体动力学等等）也只懂得一点点皮毛。佩服！
-softface(探长);
2014-8-19
(#8939240@0)
-
多谢探长美颜， 这些多是自己学习过程中的感悟外加一点research积累而成，希望能带来真正的讨论以帮助我理清思路，如果能对大家有所帮助那就是bonus
-davidsz08(我来劲了);
2014-8-19
(#8939253@0)
-
Excellent!
-redneck(Cracker);
2014-8-20
(#8939332@0)
-
+1
-looksee(qiaoqiao);
2014-8-20
(#8939781@0)
-
您说的非常有道理。回想自己学英语的过程, 现在有一种豁然开朗的感觉。我的听力显著提高是在我＂正式＂工作之后几个月。在这之前，读书，看电视，。。。有帮助。只是以幅度论， 都比不上工作那几个月。
-600677(CM);
2014-8-22
(#8945096@0)
-
原因就是您说的 SPEECH PRODUCTION。因为工作的缘故，我必须开口，这一定帮助了听力。因为听力的提高，我开口说的信心也增强了。这是个相辅相成的过程。Thank you so much for sharing your learning and thoughts.
-600677(CM);
2014-8-22
(#8945113@0)
-
值得商榷。听力的基础是以此语言进行的思维，不是发音肌肉的记忆。比如，耳朵完好的哑巴有正常的听力理解。
-geekcode(文心雕码);
2014-8-22
(#8945176@0)
-
所谓英语的思维，从motor的角度，就是对发音肌肉运动神经的组织和调配，这已经是语言学习的高级阶段，不是本文的论述范围
-davidsz08(我来劲了);
2014-8-22
(#8945317@0)
-
Put your efforts on English practice other than research, leave it to scientist.
-errands_boy(Errands Boy);
2014-8-22
(#8945246@0)
-
即使是奥运游泳冠军对运动科学（流体动力学等等）也只懂得一点点皮毛。这是为什么捏？
-softface(探长);
2014-8-22
(#8945298@0)
-
It seems to me you got my point, practice
-errands_boy(Errands Boy);
2014-8-22
(#8945321@0)
-
It appears to me that you apparently have not fathomed what I posted in (#8939240@0).
-softface(探长);
2014-8-22
(#8945365@0)
-
It will definitely get you nowhere if you practice without right approach
-davidsz08(我来劲了);
2014-8-22
(#8945309@0)
-
It'll definitely get you somewhere if you practice English, and will get you nowhere if you do the research without practice
-errands_boy(Errands Boy);
2014-8-22
(#8945320@0)
-
Here is something I don't get. What makes you to believe that David hasn't put enough effort in "practicing"? Because what he shared here is too theoretical.... according to you?
-600677(CM);
2014-8-23
(#8946122@0)
-
".... will get you nowhere if you do the research without practice." Stand along. This is right and i totally agree with you. However, given the context, what you suggested is not appropriate, .... at least not helpful.
-600677(CM);
2014-8-23
(#8946123@0)
-
What did the post above suggest? You seemed to misunderstand.
-geekcode(文心雕码);
2014-8-23
(#8946457@0)